A New Study Comparing 4He OPM to SQUIDS Reaches New Exciting Results
MagnetoEncephaloGraphy (MEG) is a non-invasive functional imaging technique that provides direct measurement of neuronal activity at a millisecond time scale. Conventional MEG systems use superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) that require very low temperatures achieved by liquid helium. This leads to high costs, environmental impact, and experimental limitations. A new generation of MEG sensors, optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs), is emerging. Alkali-based OPMs were developed first, with good sensitivity and the potential to increase the signal power of neuromagnetic activity recording. However, they require heating, have limited bandwidth and small dynamic range, and need optimised shielded rooms. Recently, MAG4Health developed a 4He OPM-MEG system, which operates at room temperature, and has no noticeable heat dissipation, large resonance linewidth, large dynamic range, and large frequency bandwidth. MAG4Health has made considerable progress in sensitivity, and the 4He-OPMs now reach better than 45 fT/√Hz on two of the three axes.
A new study has compared the performance of conventional, cryogenic SQUID-MEG and newly developed wearable room-temperature 4He-OPM sensors using a somatosensory and visual stimulation paradigm. The classical SQUID-MEG recordings were made using a 275 SQUID-based axial gradiometers MEG system. In contrast, 4He-OPMs sensors were used to measure the brain's magnetic field along three axes, with a dynamic range of ±250 nT. The subject was seated with a conformable headset housing 96 possible positions for the 4He-OPM sensors. For the somatosensory experiment, the 4 remaining 4He-OPM sensors were located in LC11, LC13, LC 31 and LC33 locations around the somatosensory area, while for the visual experiment, the 4 remaining 4He-OPM sensors were located in LO11, LO31, RO11 and RO31 locations around the primary visual area. The signal was sampled at 11 kHz.
Results show that the 4He-OPM sensors show high similarity in time courses obtained compared with SQUID-MEG, and pick up changes in oscillatory brain dynamics across the human oscillatory neural range. However, the percentage signal change from baseline is lower for 4He-OPM sensors compared to SQUID-MEG, especially in the higher oscillatory (gamma) range, possibly due to muscle activity caused by the cabling of the sensors. The study concludes that 4He-Opm’s show very similar results to SQUID-MEG systems by taking advantage of a shorter distance to the brain, despite having a lower sensitivity.
Reference Paper
Gutteling, T.P. et al. (2023) “A new generation of OPM for high dynamic and large bandwidth Meg: The 4He OPMs—first applications in healthy volunteers,” Sensors, 23(5), p. 2801. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052801.
Learn more about MagnetoEncephaloGraphy and 4He OPM-MEG here
Events
Role of the Medial Posterior Parietal Cortex in Spatial Attention
Webinar
12 Dec 2024
Threshold Tracking vs. Fixed Intensity TMS – Pros & Cons - Updated
Webinar
9 Jan 2025
Practical Introduction to Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation
Kobe, Japan
23 Feb 2025
Methods & Applications of Mobile EEG
Cardiff, UK
5 Mar 2025